Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Dodge Caravan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Astro engine produces 28 HP less power than Dodge Caravan, but torque is 7 NM more than Dodge Caravan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 12.0 | |
| Chevrolet Astro consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Caravan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Astro could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 102 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Dodge Caravan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chevrolet Astro is 2 cm longer than the Dodge Caravan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1170 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4825 litres | 4160 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 665 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Dodge Caravan has
| |