Chevrolet Astro 1995 vs Dodge Caravan 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chevrolet Astro is available with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Caravan can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 | 2.4 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 152 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 226 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 10.6 - 12.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Astro petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Caravan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chevrolet Astro is 2 cm longer than the Dodge Caravan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Astro is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1170 litres | 566 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4825 litres | 4160 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Astro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Astro has 604 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Caravan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 665 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`700 | ~ 2`452 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Astro has
|
Dodge Caravan has
| |