BMW i3 2017 vs Nissan Micra 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW i3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Nissan Micra can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 0.6 | 0.9 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 38 - 170 HP | 73 - 117 HP | |
Torque: | 56 - 250 NM | 95 - 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 8.1 seconds | 9.9 - 16.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 | 3.5 - 5.3 | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.01 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW i3 is larger. BMW i3 is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW i3 is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1004 litres | |
Despite its longer length, BMW i3 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the BMW i3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW i3 (by 96 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW i3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means BMW i3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`715 | ~ 1`542 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Micra has
| |