BMW i3 2013 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW i3
2013 - 2017
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
BMW i3 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW i3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen Polo can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.61.0 - 1.4

Performance

Power: 38 - 170 HP60 - 150 HP
Torque: 56 - 250 NM95 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 - 7.9 seconds7.8 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 0.63.4 - 4.9
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)143 - 145 mm (5.6 - 5.7 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m3.97 m
Width: 1.78 m1.68 m
Height: 1.58 m1.45 m
BMW i3 is larger.
BMW i3 is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW i3 is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1100 litres952 litres
Despite its longer length, BMW i3 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the BMW i3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW i3 (by 148 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW i3 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means BMW i3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`675~ 1`631
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data5800
Pros and Cons: BMW i3 has
  • automatic transmission only
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Polo has
  • both manual and automatic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv