BMW Z4 2011 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 34 HP more power than Audi TT, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW Z4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW Z4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.36 m | |
| BMW Z4 is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
| |