BMW Z4 2003 vs Audi TT 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| BMW Z4 engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Audi TT. Despite less power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
| By specification BMW Z4 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is larger, but lower. BMW Z4 is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z4 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 220 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity. BMW Z4 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Audi TT has
| |