BMW Z4 2006 vs Audi TT 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW Z4 engine produces 23 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A3, Volkswagen Passat CC, Volkswagen Beetle | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.36 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 9 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
260 litres | no data | |
| BMW Z4 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Audi TT has
| |