BMW Z4 2006 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, but torque is 120 NM less than Volkswagen EOS. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen EOS) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.44 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 32 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
|
BMW Z4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW Z4 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The Volkswagen EOS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volkswagen EOS has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen EOS, so Volkswagen EOS quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |