BMW Z4 2009 vs Audi TT 2010

 
BMW Z4
2009 - 2013
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP360 HP
Torque: 250 NM465 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds4.4 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
BMW Z4 engine produces 156 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 215 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.28.6
BMW Z4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway930 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.20 m
Width: 1.79 m1.84 m
Height: 1.29 m1.35 m
BMW Z4 is 4 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 180 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
310 litresno data
Audi TT has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, BMW Z4 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the BMW Z4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`855
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z4, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 18 600no data
Pros and Cons:
    Audi TT has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • has 4x4 drive
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv