BMW Z4 2009 vs Audi A5 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 34 HP more power than Audi A5, but torque is 70 NM less than Audi A5. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z4) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3 | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW Z4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.38 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 39 cm shorter than the Audi A5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
310 litres | 750 litres | |
|
Audi A5 has more luggage space. BMW Z4 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Audi A5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A5 (by 440 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi A5, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| BMW Z4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A5, so BMW Z4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Audi A5 has
| |