BMW Z4 2006 vs BMW X3 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 343 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
BMW Z4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW Z4 engine produces 112 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 65 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power BMW Z4 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z4 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z4 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z4 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 450 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 460 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.67 m | |
|
BMW Z4 is smaller. BMW Z4 is 45 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 38 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 2.2 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW Z4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| BMW Z4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X3, so BMW Z4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |