BMW Z4 2009 vs Audi TT 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW Z4
2009 - 2013
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW Z4 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol)1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 184 - 340 HP160 - 360 HP
Torque: 250 - 450 NM250 - 465 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 - 7.3 seconds4.4 - 7.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 9.05.5 - 9.5
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.19 m
Width: 1.79 m1.84 m
Height: 1.29 m1.36 m
BMW Z4 is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 180 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
310 litresno data
Audi TT has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, BMW Z4 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the BMW Z4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`767~ 1`712
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 18 600no data
Pros and Cons: BMW Z4 has
  • only petrol engines available
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv