BMW Z4 2009 vs Audi TT 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW Z4 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 - 340 HP | 160 - 360 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 450 NM | 250 - 465 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 7.3 seconds | 4.4 - 7.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.0 | 5.5 - 9.5 | |
BMW Z4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.36 m | |
BMW Z4 is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
310 litres | no data | |
Audi TT has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW Z4 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the BMW Z4 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW Z4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`767 | ~ 1`712 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z4 has
|
Audi TT has
| |