BMW Z3 2000 vs Audi TT 2003

 
BMW Z3
2000 - 2002
Audi TT
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 231 HP250 HP
Torque: 300 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds6.4 seconds
BMW Z3 engine produces 19 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Audi TT. Despite less power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.19.9
Real fuel consumption: 11.3 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW Z3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z3 could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway800 km on highway
450 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.29 m1.35 m
BMW Z3 is 1 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data180 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`890
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z3, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 64005200
Pros and Cons:
    Audi TT has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • has 4x4 drive
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv