BMW Z3 1999 vs Audi TT 2003

 
BMW Z3
1999 - 2000
Audi TT
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.8 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP250 HP
Torque: 280 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds6.4 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
BMW Z3 engine produces 57 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.9
Real fuel consumption: 11.5 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW Z3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z3 could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 490 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
620 km on highway800 km on highway
440 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.29 m1.35 m
BMW Z3 is 1 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data180 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`890
Safety: no data
Quality:Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z3 has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 64005000
Pros and Cons:
    Audi TT has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • has 4x4 drive
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv