BMW Z3 1999 vs Audi TT 2004

 
BMW Z3
1999 - 2000
Audi TT
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP250 HP
Torque: 280 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds6.5 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
BMW Z3 engine produces 57 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.411.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW Z3 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway750 km on highway
500 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.29 m1.35 m
BMW Z3 is 1 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data180 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`860
Safety: no data
Quality:Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z3 has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 64005000
Pros and Cons: BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv