BMW Z3 1996 vs Audi TT 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW Z3 engine produces 40 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW Z3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.35 m | |
|
BMW Z3 is smaller. BMW Z3 is 2 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. BMW Z3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z3 has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Audi TT has
| |