BMW Z3 1996 vs Audi TT 1999

 
BMW Z3
1996 - 1999
Audi TT
1999 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP225 HP
Torque: 180 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds6.9 seconds
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving.
BMW Z3 engine produces 85 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.09.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.2 l/100km9.9 l/100km
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW Z3 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW Z3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway870 km on highway
620 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m4.04 m
Width: 1.69 m1.76 m
Height: 1.29 m1.35 m
BMW Z3 is smaller.
BMW Z3 is 2 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 165 litres180 litres
BMW Z3 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 62005200
Pros and Cons: BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv