BMW Z3 1996 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 231 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 - 300 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 10.5 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
|
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z3 is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| BMW Z3 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |