BMW Z3 1996 vs BMW Z3 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 2.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 231 HP | 193 - 321 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 - 300 NM | 280 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 10.5 seconds | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 9.4 - 10.4 | |
|
BMW Z3 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z3 1996 is 2 cm longer than the BMW Z3 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW Z3 1996 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 410 litres | |
|
BMW Z3 1998 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW Z3 1996 has 45 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z3 1998. This could mean that the BMW Z3 1996 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |