BMW Z3 1996 vs BMW 3 series 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW Z3
1996 - 2003
BMW 3 series
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.02.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 115 - 231 HP143 - 231 HP
Torque: 168 - 300 NM200 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6 - 10.5 seconds6.9 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.8 - 10.67.7 - 10.0
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.49 m
Width: 1.73 m1.76 m
Height: 1.29 m1.37 m
BMW Z3 is smaller.
BMW Z3 is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 165 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data300 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
BMW Z3 has 135 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`501~ 1`949
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 64004600
Pros and Cons: BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv