BMW X6 2014 vs Audi Q7 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW X6
2014 - 2019
Audi Q7
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 3.0 - 4.42.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 249 - 575 HP218 - 333 HP
Torque: 400 - 750 NM370 - 600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.2 - 6.7 seconds6.1 - 7.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 11.15.5 - 8.1
BMW X6 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q7. On average, BMW X6 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.91 m5.03 m
Width: 1.99 m1.97 m
Height: 1.70 m1.74 m
BMW X6 is 12 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X6 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 580 litres770 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1525 litres1955 litres
Audi Q7 has more luggage space.
BMW X6 has 190 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 430 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.8 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`846~ 2`844
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 37 20039 000
Pros and Cons:
    Audi Q7 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv