BMW X5 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 520 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 65 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 147 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.87 m | |
| BMW X5 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW X5 has 405 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |