BMW X5 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 81 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 73 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X5 is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 639 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 497 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`625 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| BMW X5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than BMW X5, so BMW X5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |