BMW X5 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X5 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.6 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 347 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 480 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 15.0 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
BMW X5 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, BMW X5 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger, but lower. BMW X5 is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 639 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 497 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`646 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |