BMW X4 2014 vs Volvo XC60 2013

 
BMW X4
2014 - 2018
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 184 HP240 HP
Torque: 270 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 seconds8.1 seconds
BMW X4 engine produces 56 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.28.5
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW X4 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 67 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1020 km on highway
BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.64 m
Width: 1.88 m1.89 m
Height: 1.62 m1.71 m
BMW X4 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X4 is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1400 litres1455 litres
BMW X4 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 55 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3252`270
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo XC60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X4 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22 80016 000
Pros and Cons: BMW X4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv