BMW X4 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X4 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
900 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW X4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
BMW X4 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW X4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 128 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1608 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, BMW X4 has 372 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 208 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means BMW X4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`335 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
BMW X4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW X4, so BMW X4 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 21 400 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |