BMW X4 2014 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X4 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X4 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power BMW X4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X4 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the BMW X4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
BMW X4 is larger, but lower. BMW X4 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW X4 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 986 litres | |
|
BMW X4 has more luggage capacity. BMW X4 has 280 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X4 (by 414 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X4 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means BMW X4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`335 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| BMW X4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than BMW X4, so BMW X4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X4 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |