BMW X1 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 21 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X1 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the BMW X1 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X1 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.70 m | |
|
BMW X1 is smaller. BMW X1 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. BMW X1 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 218 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |