BMW X1 2019 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
BMW X1 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X1 engine produces 34 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power BMW X1 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X1 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X1 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 472 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1478 litres | |
BMW X1 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X1 has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 72 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X1 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means BMW X1 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 1`994 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 32 000 | 18 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X1 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |