BMW 6 series 2015 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 - 560 HP | 180 - 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 680 NM | 340 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 5.4 seconds | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.9 | 4.3 - 8.6 | |
|
BMW 6 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. On average, BMW 6 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
| BMW 6 series is 5 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 10 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 6 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1265 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 6 series has 80 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the BMW 6 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 6 series is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means BMW 6 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`442 | ~ 2`302 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 400 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar XF has
| |