BMW 6 series 2015 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 6 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 6 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 - 560 HP | 258 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 - 680 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 5.3 seconds | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.9 | 7.5 - 13.8 | |
|
BMW 6 series petrol engines consumes on average 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, BMW 6 series equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.84 m | |
|
BMW 6 series is smaller. BMW 6 series is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 16 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 6 series is 47 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. BMW 6 series has 90 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 6 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means BMW 6 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`291 | ~ 3`117 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 800 | 50 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 6 sērija has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |