BMW 3 series 1987 vs Ford Sierra 1990

 
BMW 3 series
1987 - 1991
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP220 HP
Torque: 222 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds6.9 seconds
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.010.6
Real fuel consumption: 10.4 l/100km12.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
610 km with real consumption490 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.49 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.38 m
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher.
BMW 3 series is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 404 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
425 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7601`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 42001800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Sierra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv