BMW 3 series 2005 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2003

 
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 156
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP175 HP
Torque: 340 NM385 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds8.6 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 12 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1140 km on highway
930 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.43 m
Width: 1.82 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
BMW 3 series is larger.
BMW 3 series is 9 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres360 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1385 litres1180 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 100 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 205 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0451`895
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

low
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 40001200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv