BMW 3 series 2018 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
BMW 3 series
2018 - 2020
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP180 HP
Torque: 400 NM224 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 secondsn/a seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 176 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.55.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway1100 km on highway
650 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērijaUsed also on Mazda CX-30
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.66 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres450 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0851`948
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 34 00014 800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv