BMW 3 series 2008 vs Honda Accord 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2012
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Accord can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.02.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 122 - 306 HP150 - 201 HP
Torque: 160 - 580 NM192 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.5 - 11.9 seconds8 - 10.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 9.75.3 - 8.6
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.73 m
Width: 1.82 m1.84 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 20 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres467 litres
BMW 3 series has 7 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`023~ 2`024
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 58006800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv