BMW 3 series 2005 vs Volvo V70 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2008
Volvo V70
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 122 - 306 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 180 - 580 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 - 11 seconds5.9 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 11.06.5 - 13.6
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.71 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.49 m
BMW 3 series is 19 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1385 litres1641 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 256 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`103~ 2`129
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 40003000
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.1/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volvo V70 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv