BMW 2 series 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 2 series engine produces 34 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Thanks to more power BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 2 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.58 m | |
| BMW 2 series is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 2 series has 110 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. This could mean that the BMW 2 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`885 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |