BMW 2 series 2013 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 194 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
BMW 2 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 2 series engine produces 34 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 186 NM more than Kia Cerato. Thanks to more power BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.9 | |
The BMW 2 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 2 series consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that by driving the BMW 2 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
BMW 2 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Cerato) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 2 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 2 series is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 2 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 433 litres | |
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. BMW 2 series has 43 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`885 | 1`242 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |