BMW 2 series 2013 vs Audi 80 1990

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 2 series
2013 - 2017
Audi 80
1990 - 1995
Body: CabrioSedan
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 2 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 2 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.5 - 3.01.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 136 - 340 HP70 - 174 HP
Torque: 220 - 500 NM118 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.6 - 9.6 seconds8 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 8.55.2 - 10.3
BMW 2 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, BMW 2 series equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 130 - 140 mm (5.1 - 5.5 inches)110 - 135 mm (4.3 - 5.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.48 m
Width: 1.77 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
BMW 2 series is 4 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
335 litres710 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage space.
BMW 2 series has 150 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi 80 (by 375 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`015~ 1`745
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 25 600800
Pros and Cons: BMW 2 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Audi 80 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv