Audi TT 2003 vs BMW Z3 2000

 
Audi TT
2003 - 2006
BMW Z3
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP231 HP
Torque: 320 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.4 seconds6.3 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 19 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW Z3. Despite the higher power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.910.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km11.3 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle500 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway670 km on highway
630 km with real consumption450 km with real consumption
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.05 m
Width: 1.76 m1.74 m
Height: 1.35 m1.29 m
Audi TT is 1 cm shorter than the BMW Z3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 180 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8901`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z3, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 52006400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv