Audi TT 2003 vs BMW Z3 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
Audi TT engine produces 19 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than BMW Z3. Despite the higher power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.04 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.29 m | |
Audi TT is 1 cm shorter than the BMW Z3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW Z3, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
| |