Audi TT 2008 vs BMW Z4 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 150 NM more than BMW Z4. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 9 cm longer than the BMW Z4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 240 litres | |
| Audi TT has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |