Audi TT 2010 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen EOS, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen EOS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen EOS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen EOS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.44 m | |
| Audi TT is 24 cm shorter than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The Volkswagen EOS may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen EOS has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |