Audi TT 1998 vs Toyota Celica 2002

 
Audi TT
1998 - 2005
Toyota Celica
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP192 HP
Torque: 280 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.6 seconds7.4 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 33 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway830 km on highway
620 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.35 m
Width: 1.76 m1.74 m
Height: 1.34 m1.32 m
Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 44002400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Toyota Celica has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv