Audi TT 2005 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.32 m | |
| Audi TT is 31 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 2 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |