Audi TT 2008 vs BMW 1 series 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 1 series, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW 1 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 1 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Audi A4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 1 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.18 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.42 m | |
Audi TT is 18 cm shorter than the BMW 1 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 370 litres | |
BMW 1 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 80 litres less trunk space than the BMW 1 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW 1 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`740 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8200 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 1 sērija has
| |