Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 6 series 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
BMW 6 series is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 143 HP less power than BMW 6 series, whereas torque is 280 NM less than BMW 6 series. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 6 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Audi TT is smaller. Audi TT is 71 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 292 litres | 460 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 168 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |