Audi TT 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2010

 
Audi TT
2010 - 2014
BMW 3 series
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 160 HP177 HP
Torque: 250 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds7.9 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 17 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle1270 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway1480 km on highway
720 km with real consumption1080 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.61 m
Width: 1.84 m1.78 m
Height: 1.35 m1.40 m
Audi TT is 43 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 292 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`6401`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 40010 000
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv