Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.4
6.3
Real fuel consumption:
7.6 l/100km
8.1 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity:
55 litres
63 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
850 km in combined cycle
1000 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway
1280 km on highway
720 km with real consumption
770 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Drive type
Wheel drive type:
Front wheel drive (FWD)
Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Dimensions
Length:
4.19 m
4.58 m
Width:
1.84 m
1.78 m
Height:
1.35 m
1.40 m
Audi TT is 39 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:
292 litres
440 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 148 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter:
10.9 meters
11 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series.
Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
