Audi TT 2014 vs Mazda MX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Audi TT engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda MX-5, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda MX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.24 m | |
|
Audi TT is larger. Audi TT is 26 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 130 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage capacity. Audi TT has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.96 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.56 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda MX-5 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |