Audi TT 2007 vs BMW Z4 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Audi TT
2007 - 2010
BMW Z4
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Audi TT is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW Z4 can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 3.2 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 160 - 272 HP150 - 343 HP
Torque: 250 - 350 NM200 - 365 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 7.7 seconds5 - 8.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 10.47.5 - 12.2
Audi TT petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.09 m
Width: 1.84 m1.78 m
Height: 1.36 m1.30 m
Audi TT is larger.
Audi TT is 10 cm longer than the BMW Z4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres240 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data260 litres
Audi TT has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4.
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 1.2 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Audi TT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`721~ 1`604
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 520014 800
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW Z4 has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv